Were the “I Dos” Properly Done?

Posted on June 14, 2018 by Amanda DiChello



In order to be a surviving spouse to inherit under the intestate laws (the statutory laws that apply when one dies without a will), a person needs to have been married to the decedent first. You might think this is pretty obvious, but a recent Orphans’ Court case dealt with the issue of what it means to be “married” in Pennsylvania.

We’ve all seen the wedding announcements in the newspaper where the couple is married by a friend of the family ordained by an internet-based organization.

But, is that legal in Pennsylvania?

In some cases, yes; in other cases, no.

“Common law marriage” was abolished by statute in Pennsylvania after January 1, 2005. Section 1301 of the Pennsylvania Marriage Act requires that a couple obtain a marriage license from the state. Marriages may be performed by a number of officiants, including judges, mayors. and clergy of any “regularly established church or congregation.”

You can picture the wedding… it’s a beautiful sunny day. Everyone is in a wonderful mood. The happy couple has selected the groom’s dearest and oldest friend to officiate the marriage. The dear friend, who is not a member of the clergy in any way, shape, or form, learns that he can be ordained as a minister to marry the happy couple, simply by filling out some basic information and paying a fee online, which he gladly does for them. The ceremony goes off without a hitch. Everyone is happy. The bride is beautiful. The champagne and hors d’oeuvres are flowing. All is right with the world – until the husband dies tragically without a will a mere four years later.

The deceased husband’s mother, who attended the wedding ceremony, seeks to open the estate after her son’s death. The wife, assuming she is to inherit everything from her husband as the surviving spouse under the Pennsylvania laws of intestacy, challenges her mother-in-law’s petition and files her own petition seeking to be declared the surviving spouse of the decedent and therefore, the rightful intestate heir. Litigation ensues in the Orphans’ Court over the validity of the marriage.

That is exactly what occurred in Estate of Zimmerman, a recent case from the Orphans’ Court in Montgomery County, Pa., in which the wife brought a declaratory judgment action to be recognized as the surviving spouse of the decedent, asserting that the formal marriage ceremony performed by a close friend of her now-deceased husband, and with a Pennsylvania marriage license, was indeed valid.

The court agreed.

One of the main issues was whether the friend – who had been ordained online – was qualified to perform the marriage. A secondary issue involved the validity of the marriage license itself because the dear friend – the online ordained minister – did not complete the marriage license correctly and there were alleged problems with the license itself.

While he could not remember, five years after the fact, which organization had ordained him for the purposes of performing the ceremony and could not produce the certificate provided to him, the friend testified that he had applied online to the organization with “the easiest process,” that he believed that he could properly perform the ceremony, and that he would not have officiated had he not believed he was not properly ordained.

The wife also produced an email from the First Nation Church and Ministry, establishing that the friend had been granted a two-year ordination with the minister’s license number, and a letter from the organization detailing the long and established history of the church and its process of ordination. The letter explained that the church does not grant instant credentials, but rather does background checks on applicants to determine character, profession, and reputation in the community.

Noting no appellate court decisions on the issue of internet ordination, the court looked to two lower court cases on the issue.

In Hever v. Hollerbush, the court voided the marriage, finding that the ceremony was performed by a “minister” of an entirely online organization with no real congregation or place of worship, and that the officiant, who received the credentials within minutes of applying for them and who had never attended any meetings of the “church,” was the only witness. In contrast, in O’Neill v. O’Neill, the court found the marriage valid where the ceremony was performed by the bride’s uncle, who had been ordained more than three years before the wedding and who testified that he took his responsibilities seriously and had counseled the couple prior to the ceremony.

The Zimmerman court concluded that the marriage was valid between the decedent and the petitioner under Pennsylvania law for a number of reasons. The evidence showed that the couple had a formal wedding ceremony and all involved – the couple, the friend who acted as officiant, and family and friends who attended the ceremony – believed that the friend had the authority to perform the wedding, and the couple had acted “knowingly and voluntarily…in pursuit of a valid marriage certificate.” Noting First Nation Church’s history and non-profit status, the court found sufficient evidence that the officiant had been ordained a “minister” of a “regularly established church or congregation.”

The court also noted that the filing of the marriage certificate – which apparently neither the friend nor the couple did – did not invalidate the marriage because filing was a “ministerial act designed to record proof of the marriage.” The marriage was valid as of the date of the ceremony.

Our Mission

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur elit, sed do eiusmod tempor ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Our Plan

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo.

Our Vision

Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aut odit aut fugit, sed quia magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet.

Services

Laudem latine persequeris id sed, ex fabulas delectus quo. No vel partiendo abhorreant vituperatoribus, ad pro quaestio laboramus. Ei ubique vivendum pro. At ius nisl accusam lorenta zanos paradigno tridexa panatarel.

Lorem Ipsum

Voluptatum deleniti atque corrupti quos dolores et quas molestias excepturi sint occaecati cupiditate non provident

Dolor Sitema

Minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat tarad limino ata

Sed ut perspiciatis

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur

Magni Dolores

Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum

Nemo Enim

At vero eos et accusamus et iusto odio dignissimos ducimus qui blanditiis praesentium voluptatum deleniti atque

Eiusmod Tempor

Et harum quidem rerum facilis est et expedita distinctio. Nam libero tempore, cum soluta nobis est eligendi

Call To Action

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Call To Action

Our Skills

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip

HTML 100%
CSS 90%
JavaScript 75%
Photoshop 55%

Facts

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque

274

Clients

421

Projects

1,364

Hours Of Support

18

Hard Workers

Our Portfolio

  • All
  • App
  • Card
  • Web

App 1

App

Web 3

Web

App 2

App

Card 2

Card

Web 2

Web

App 3

App

Card 1

Card

Card 3

Card

Web 1

Web

Our Clients

Testimonials

Team

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque

Walter White

Chief Executive Officer

Sarah Jhonson

Product Manager

William Anderson

CTO

Amanda Jepson

Accountant

Contact Us

Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque

Address

A108 Adam Street, NY 535022, USA

Phone Number

+1 5589 55488 55

Your message has been sent. Thank you!